quash

Submit:  PR?  Quash THIS.

too lazy to break this up. maybe spinsie or one of the other anons who seem to understand these things a tad more have thoughts. the only time ive ever seen BC PR officially comment on neg rumours is to quash the idea that any cheating went on on bens side to lead to a break up (AJ and OP) and to quash the idea that he is racist. the only time ive seen him go into damage control is w his multiple racially insensitive comments, either from Karon or him. even the hint of the beginning of a racist rumour (bird flip asian twitter insident) and Karon swoops in. Now maybe his PR don’t know (tho i would assume that they monitor SH side of things) but i wonder why they would apparently be ok w his wifes friends making racist comments? could it simply be that its not mainstream and joe blow doesn’t know who gambles is? its very clear that SH and Gambles are friends, pictures all over, and he has said so himself. he was at the wedding and helped pimp it. as far as the public is concerned, SH and BC are a unit, a united front, a family. would it not concern his PR that he seemed to fall in love and marry a woman who runs w out right, balls to the wall , no shame racists? racists who have no ish spewing racist comments on public social media? that w his “coloured” comment makes it look like he, his wife, their circle are behind closed doors racist (well, not benedicts wifes cirlce, they are out in the open racists). so why are they not concerned w that? the avg person who considers themselves not to be racist (as loaded as that sort of thought is) would never even consider marrying someone who is very close friends w people say such racist things. all that rant to say, when i hear someone say racist stuff, im sorry, but i am weary of their friends. bc is constantly saying racially insensitive things, now he is married to a woman who has pictures w and is good friends w ppl who are racist on twitter. why is this not a concern for BCs ppl. like it or not, gambles racist comments, plus BC racist shit, to me, paints the picture of a bunch of priv spoiled white kids who are racists behind (and sometimes in front) of closed doors, and its leaking out.add to that comments from other friends,BC whinging in interviews, it paints not a good picture of BC. like it or not, you’re associated w friends,and you’re DEF associated w your WIFE. and his WIFE seems perfectly happy to be friends w RACISTS. so, why would PR not deal w this? hope that  makes sense. thanks for the ramble roo BTT.

=====================================================

Ballsy:  Just making this clear – in case anyone is unsure what the above is about.  I have used visual aids so that even Ben’s inept PR can understand.  PR?  Wanna deal with this? 

This guy.  Matthew Daniel Siskin (MDS)– AKA “Gambles”.  That’s him circled.  With Sophie. With Benedict (who has described him as a “dear pal” apparently).  As a guest at their Wedding.  That guy.

Said this on Twitter- directed at a fan of Beyoncé.  


And whilst Benedict did not say that, nor did Sophie - he is their friend.  They choose to associate with him.  That.

In addition, the judge saw the joinder of 300 defendants as little more than a ploy for saving cash. “No predicate has been shown for thus combining 300 separate actions on the cheap,” he added. “If CP had sued the 300 claimed infringers separately for their discrete infringements, the filing fees alone would have aggregated $105,000 rather than $350.”
—  Judge Dumps Yet Another Mass Infringement Suit In Response To Single, Pro Se Motion To Quash | Techdirt - ah look, RIAA equivalent bullshit is failing. Surprise? Not really.
youtube

Yeah X3 (Music Video) (by Snowdrifthowl)

My friends and me upstate bored… :)

  • Artist: Don Hazeltine
  • Card Name: Quash
  • Card Number: no 42
  • Card Text: Counter target instant or sorcery spell. Search its controller’s graveyard, hand, and library for all cards with the same name as that spell and exile them. Then that player shuffles his or her library.
  • Community Rating: 3 to 3.99
  • Converted Mana Cost: 4
  • Expansion: Urza’s Destiny
  • Mana Cost: [2][Blue][Blue]
  • Rarity: Uncommon
  • Types: Instant
Ouki Kaname Blog Translation

2015-04-25 13:37:41
I’m Sorry

Tickets went on sale for the Osaka concert today.
My agent told me that they sold out in a second. 😍
“Eee, I’m so happy!” I thought, and opened up my blog… 
As expected, there were a ton of comments from people saying they couldn’t get tickets… 😭

I can’t release a DVD, either… I’m not sure what to do. 😔
It also doesn’t look like there are any plans to sell same-day tickets…
I’m going to think of some place where I can show everyone the new me. 😜

I’m going to kick back and relax on this cloudy day. 😲
Oh, right. The SMAPxSMAP Great Sports Day from before will be airing again on Monday~

See you~

(Original entry: http://ameblo.jp/kanameouki/entry-12018654711.html)

6

Well, I think it’s tricky with this kind of genre & with period pieces when you look at female characters. If we’re going to really look at what the world was like then women were completely - had no voice & were second class citizens & were very much kind of quashed. For a modern audience you have to create umh - women who have a spirit & are fallible, so we’re as all the characters are, you know, you have to create that sort of complexity within them. x 

Vengeful 498A 406 against FIL quashed

*Case filed 11 years after marriage. Omnibus complaints added against
father in law to satisfy the personal grudge and vendetta. Hon Patna HC
quashes complaint against father in law quoting Geeta Mehrotra & Anr v.
State U.P.*

*****************************disclaimer**********************************

This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were
collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of
India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon or High
court websites. Some notes are made by Vinayak. Should you find the dictum
in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like
to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment
section of the blog and if you are reading this on tumblr please post
responses as comments at vinayak.wordpress.com . Vinayak is NOT a lawyer
and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as
legal advise.

******************************************************************

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA*

*Criminal Miscellaneous No.22329 of 2012*

***********************************************************

*Shatrughan Singh @ Shatrudhan Singh *

son of Late Kaleshwar Singh,

R/O Village- Karnal Chandi,

PS Charpokhari Distt- Bhojpur. …. …. Petitioner/s

Versus

*1. The State of Bihar*

*2. Smt. Bindi Devi wife of Sanjay Singh *

D/O Shri Haribansh Singh,

presently residing in village-Berath,

PS.Chauri, Distt-Bhojpur …. …. Opposite Party/s

***********************************************************

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunanda Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jharkhandi Puadhyaya, APP.

http://evinayak.tumblr.com http://vinayak.wordpress.com
http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

***********************************************************

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date: 11-02-2015

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the
State. In spite of appearance of OP NO.2, none has represented her.

2. Petitioner, who happens to be father-in-law along with others including
husband has been summoned to face trial for an offence punishable
under *Sections
498A, 406, 342 of the IPC vide order dated 06.04.2011 passed by SDJM,
Bhojpur at Ara in Complaint Case No. 2100/2010, Trial No. 3004/2010 on a
complaint filed by OP NO.2, Bindi Devi who happens to be wife of Sanjay
Singh, son of petitioner* whereunder, she had alleged that *after marriage
in the year 1999*, she came to her Sasural where accused persons advanced
demand of Rs.2,50,000/- in lieu of dowry and to facilitate the same, she
was also tortured.

3. It has further *been alleged that in the year 2008*, father of
complainant had paid Rs. 1 Lakh to her husband, Sanjay Singh who had
purchased one Commander Jeep in partnership with his friend. Subsequently
thereof, they revived demand of dowry and having been denied at her side,
on 18.09.2010, the accused persons brutally assaulted her on account of
which there happens to be fracture in her left hand as well as also
sustained injury over different parts of her body. The accused persons
remained immune with her condition and lastly, on 27.09.2010, she was
kicked out after retaining her ornaments, clothes etc.
http://evinayak.tumblr.com http://vinayak.wordpress.com
http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

4. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that from the narration of
the complain petition itself, it is apparent that it was the husband who
had indulged in such kind of activity, otherwise, there was no occasion for
the father of the complainant/OP NO-2 to pay Rs. 1 Lakh to the husband of
O.P. NO.2/complainant. It has further been submitted that from the
complaint petition, *it is also apparent that marriage took place in the
year 1999 and the case has been filed after eleven years of date of
marriage and during intervening period, as expected, the petitioner has
gone old and now became victim of circumstances*. It has further been
submitted that *in omnibus way the allegation has been attributed to the
petitioner even during course of S.A. as well as statement of the witnesses*,
is indicative of the fact that being father of the husband of the
complainant, he has been *implicated in this case to satisfy the personal
grudge and vendetta*. So submitted that the order of cognizance should be
set aside.

5. On the other hand, learned APP opposed the prayer and submitted that at
the present stage, presence of prima facie case suggests validity of the
order of cognizance.

6. After going through the order impugned as well as complaint petition
along with other materials, it is apparent that no specific allegation has
been attributed to the petitioner.

7. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Geeta Mehrotra & Anr v. State U.P.
reported in 2013 AIR SC 181 has held that usually the family members are
being implicated in a case under Section 498A IPC along with other allied
Sections by way of retaliation and unless and until, there happens to be
specific allegation, the prosecution should not be allowed to proceed.
http://evinayak.tumblr.com http://vinayak.wordpress.com
http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

8*. Accordingly, the order dated 06.04.2011 passed by the learned lower
court to the extent of petitioner is quashed. Petition is allowed.*

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)

perwez

U T

*Tags : *

PDF uploaded to http://1drv.ms/1DtEgNs


*****************

FOLLOW http://twitter.com/ATMwithDick on twitter or
http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ on wordpress or http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ FOR
100s of high court and supreme court cases


regards

Vinayak
Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an
compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn’t given up, Male, activist