Rosa de Luxemburgo 

~Textos de Rosa:

La acumulación del capital 

Reforma o Revolución

COMPILADO DE OBRAS ESCOGIDAS

Crítica al bolchevismo

La acumulación del capital o en qué han convertido los epígonos la teoría de Marx

Huelga de masas, partido y sindicatos

Contra la pena capital 

~Textos sobre Rosa:

ROSA LUXEMBURG Y LA ESPONTANEIDAD REVOLUCIONARIA

Rosa Luxemburg o el precio de la libertad

Rosa Luxemburg, la flor más roja del socialismo


~Parte 1 - Emma Goldman

~Parte 2 - Simone de Beauvoir

~Parte 3 - Rosa de Luxemburgo

~Parte 4 - Mujeres en la guerra civil española

~Parte 5 - Mujeres en Chile

~Parte 6 - Textos sobre lucha y emancipación en latinoamérica y el mundo

~Parte 7 - Feminismo en la escuela / Educando con feminismo

Fun Fact on Marxist Communism and Religion

So yesterday I went to an interesting discussion, where the quote “religion is the opiate of the masses” came up. Cool cool, we all know it, it’s used more often than not to shake off religion as something weak or stupid.

EXCEPT NO.

Here’s a bit of context around the quote:

"Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people." (A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, 1844)

Marx saw religion as something people clung to to not lose all hope in their corrupt society. We see the quote today as meaning religion was a drug which kept people from seeing clearly, but in fact Marx was of the opinion that it was a drug which helped people dull the pain of a reality they were very well aware of. He wrote before the invention of penicillin (1897), at which point opium would have been widely used as a medical painkiller. So religion didn’t make people bumbling idiots who would follow every order; it was used by people to protest their deplorable socio-political situations.

Not long after I arrived in the United States, I met an American woman at a friend’s home. She told me with apparent pride that her daughter was a cheerleader. I did not know what kind of leader that was. Hearing her explanation, I could not bring myself to present a compliment, as she obviously expected. I only wished that my eyes did not betray my disdain as I said to my- self, “I guess this American woman has never dreamed of her daughter being a leader cheered by men.” I felt fortunate that I had been “brainwashed” to want to be a revolutionary instead of a cheerleader… .

Was “brainwashing” girls to desire to be “young vanguards” in socialist construction more oppressive and limiting than ‘“brainwashing” girls to desire to be cheerleaders for football games? No.

—  Wang Zheng; “Some of Us: Chinese Women Growing Up in the Mao Era”