Avoid "Global" Labels in Arguments That Undermine Conflict Resolution

In a relationship, arguments are normal. The goal, however, should be to finish the argument and solve your problems . Using “global” statements that describe a problem with a person’s character (as opposed to actions) undermine resolution. So, it’s best to avoid them.

Read more…









http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/VxNTJbJu5fo/avoid-global-labels-in-arguments-that-undermine-confl-1636272144
via: Lifehacker
http://lifehacker.com

Do you have a great thought, article, tweet, or anything else you want to share? submit your post!


About this blog:
my name is Travis and I’m a marketer and scratch developer from Winston Salem, NC. I work with many advanced tools to make marketing easier and more manageable for businesses, organizations, individuals and agencies. hire me or learn more

Urgent Part 2 - Urgent Death Row Dogs

TO BE DESTROYED - 09/13/14
Brooklyn Center - P

My name is ROCKY. My Animal ID # is A1002132.
I am a neutered male br brindle and white pit bull mix. The shelter thinks I am about 1 YEAR 3 MONTHS old.

I came in the shelter as a RETURN on 08/27/2014 from NY 11219, owner surrender reason stated was PETS CONFL. 

VIDEO : 
http://youtu.be/JFGP4SX_QTY

ADDITIONAL PHOTOS : 
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=816263418386539&set=a.814304851915729.1073743166.152876678058553&type=3&theater

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=816263608386520&set=a.814304851915729.1073743166.152876678058553&type=3&theater

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=816263698386511&set=a.814304851915729.1073743166.152876678058553&type=3&theater

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=863423317003882

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=863423320337215

Rocky has been pulled by Rebound Hounds ResQ!

Abstract

This paper analyzes the joint dynamics of religious beliefs and scienti…fic-economic development. It emphasizes in particular how this coevolution is shaped by (and feeds back on) political confl‡icts and coalition formation, along both religious and income lines. As part of our motivating evidence, we also uncover a new fact: in both international and cross-state U.S. data, there is a signi…ficant negative relationship between religiosity and innovativeness (patents per capita), even after controlling for the standard empirical determinants of the latter.

To shed light on the workings of the science-religion-politics nexus and its growth and distributional implications, the paper develops a model with three key features: (i) the recurrent arrival of scientifi…c discoveries which, if widely di¤used and implemented, generate productivity gains but sometimes also erode existing religious beliefs (a source of utility for some agents) by contradicting important aspects of the doctrine; (ii) a government that can allow such ideas and innovations to spread, or spend resources to censor them and impede their diffusion; (iii) a religious organization or sector (Church or churches) that can, at a cost, undertake an adaptation of the doctrine that renders it more compatible with the new knowledge.

The model leads to the emergence of three types of long-term outcomes. The fi…rst is a Secularization ”or “Western-European ”regime, with declining religiosity, unimpeded scienti…fic progress, a passive Church and high levels of taxes and secular public spending. The second is a “Theocratic” regime with knowledge stagnation, extreme religiosity, a Church that makes no effort to adapt since its beliefs are protected by the state, and also high taxes but now used to subsidize the religious sector. In-between these two is a third, “American” regime, which generally (not always) succeeds in combining unimpeded scienti…fic progress and stable religiosity within a range where the state does not block new discoveries and the religious sector fi…nds it worthwhile to invest in doctrinal repair and adaptation. This regime features lower taxes than the other two, but with positive revenue or tax exemptions allocated to religious activities. We also show that, in this “American” regime, a rise in income inequality can lead the religious rich to form a “religious-right”alliance with the religious poor and start blocking belief-eroding discoveries and ideas. Inequality can thus be harmful to knowledge and growth, by inducing obscurantist, anti-science attitudes and polices.

Here is material I recommend for learning more about the Bosnian War:

Here is material I recommend for learning more about the Bosnian War:

The BBC documentary series Death of Yugoslavia is pretty great.

Recommended reading material (diverse explanations for the wars in the Balkans):

“I consider fiŽrst the violent conflicts in Croatia and Bosnia. These were spawned not so much by the convulsive surging of ancient hatreds or by frenzies whipped up by demagogic politicians and the media as…

View On WordPress

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video