I’m sure you split stories like this into two pages for a good reason: to save my bandwidth. After all, the remaining 3,126 characters of the story’s body (1,530 bytes as transferred with gzip compression) would have increased the page’s total size by 0.32%.
No, I’m just yanking your chain. I know you’re double-charging your advertisers for the same story by artificially inflating your pageview count. It’s just like the old auto-frame-refresh trick, but this one’s better because most of the ad networks haven’t banned it yet. That’s their problem, right? Why should you leave money on the table? You’re a business.
But it doesn’t really work as well as you had hoped because only a tiny percentage of viewers will actually read page two. You know that, but you don’t care, because you won’t give up a chance to make a few extra cents. Who cares if it annoys the crap out of that tiny slice of your audience? Who are they, anyway? The people who actually read your content thoroughly instead of skimming the headline and moving on? That can’t possibly be your most important audience segment — they’re just the most involved and attentive. Repeat customers. You already have their “eyeballs” that you can sell to your real customers. And these dupes get their eyeballs double-counted. What a steal!
Keep up the great work, publishers.
114 things lammer likes Explore more popular stuff on Tumblr →
-
wizzninetynine reblogged marco:Dear Every Site That Paginates Articles
-
After months of prowling Internet chat rooms, posing as the mother of two young daughters, Detective Michele Deery thought she had a live one: “parafling,” a married, middle-aged man who claimed he wanted to have sex with her kids. But was he just playing a twisted game of seduction? Both the policewoman and her target give the author their versions of the truth, in a case that challenges the conventional wisdom about online sexual predators, and blurs the lines among crime, “intent,” and enticement.
-
Astronaut is a new public theme I made. Everything is customizable.
-
amandalynferri reblogged oats:
-
My Catan costume is closer detail, under construction two weeks ago. Made with wood, plaster, and lichen.
My friend Pepper took some shots of us cutting out the forms.
-
jstn:
I recently redesigned my portfolio site. No new projects up yet, but the old page was feeling lifeless. Hire me?
-
Adam’s ode to his favorite computer speakers inspired me to finally post a photo of my new desk setup.
My first computer speakers were the pack-ins that came with my first sound-card kit. They were powered by a pair of C batteries each, and didn’t sound awful. (I’ve heard much worse from computer speakers.)
But they sucked compared to the midrange consumer stereo I had a few feet away from the computer, so I, a geeky sixth-grader, got my mother to drive me to Radio Shack so I could buy the 1/8”-to-RCA cable that would connect my sound card to my stereo.
I never bought computer speakers again.
Sure, they can be compact, practical, and economical. But I’ve never heard a set of computer speakers that I liked better than a decent detachable-speaker integrated stereo or, like my current setup, a basic receiver and a pair of bookshelf speakers.
Computer speakers tend to fail in four main ways:
- Someone got the idea that computers should have “surround sound”, even though most owners of such speaker sets are listening to music most or all of the time, so every college kid in 2001 had satellite speakers all over the place with long wires tangling everywhere along the way with no regard for intended speaker placement.
- They usually have giant subwoofers that sit below the desk and make everything way too boomy. The speakers then omit their woofers, so all of the bass comes from below the desk in big booms and it never quite mixes properly with the rest of the range.
- They look awful, often with bright blue LEDs or tacky plastic accents.
- They just don’t sound good compared to real stereo components — even the $300-range “premium” computer speakers from Klipsch, Altec Lansing, Logitech, and Creative.
My current setup follows a pretty simple formula: Get whatever receiver you can find for a reasonable price that’s from a decent consumer brand. Mine’s an Onkyo TX-8222. Stereo only, no surround nonsense. Old technology works just fine here: garage sales, thrift stores, or your parents’ basement will often have perfectly good receivers for free or almost-free.
Then get a really great pair of bookshelf speakers. These can often be almost-free as well, but I decided to splurge and get the “entry-level” (cheapest) pair available from a highly regarded audiophile brand (these). They cost about $250. Nearly every highly-regarded speaker brand has a great bookshelf offering for less than $300. Audiophiles hold their equipment to such high standards (that frequently cross the placebo line in hilarious and sad ways) that even their “entry-level” models sound a lot better than nearly anything you’ll find in Best Buy, even for far more money.
Then set the equalizer (and any applicable bass/treble knobs) to flat, unmodified output.
It sounds ridiculously good.
And you don’t need a boomy subwoofer to annoy your neighbors and distort your sound mix. (I know, they make good foot rests. Get a UPS instead.)
$250 plus the cost of the receiver ($0-200) is a lot of money compared to most “premium” computer speakers, which tend to be $150-300. But how often do you need to buy these? Bookshelf speakers and basic receivers can last decades.
Computer speakers still win if you need a complete setup for very little money, or if you need them to take up as little space as possible. But the massive difference in sound quality makes the receiver setup far more worthwhile to me.
Note: I recognize that my speakers should be on stands that raise them by about a foot. I haven’t yet found good stands of the proper height. They still sound amazing.
-
If Dan Brown’s latest is The Lost Symbol, you might say Nabokov’s Laura is The Last Symbols: his final written words, the draft he wanted burned if he died before completing it. The one that had been secreted away in a strongbox in a Swiss bank vault for decades. The one that existed in the form of 138 index cards, covered with his pencil-written prose. The one—and this is what made it so seductive, an object of worldwide fascination among littérateurs—that might contain a clue or clues, a code, for all we knew, that would offer new perspective on the often cryptic prose of past Nabokov masterpieces.
-
pile:
I’ve had a small website running on 1&1 (a hosting company) for years and finally decided it wasn’t worth my time anymore. Canceling it wasn’t as easy, first I had to Google “cancel 1&1” to even find documentation on how to do it. Of course, they put their cancellation pages on it’s own subdomain (cancel.1and1.com). I’m not sure if that’s so people can find it easily (unlikely) or that so search engines wont index it (likely).
I submitted my request and then had to wait for an email with a cancellation link, I clicked that and the page I landed at indicated I was done (surprisingly painless). Fast forward 5 days, I get this:
Second-to-Last Step … Finish Cancellation Request
Important: You will shortly receive 2 e-mail messages sent to the address specified in your User Settings in your 1&1 Control Panel. One message acknowledges that you have started the cancellation process and the second contains a specific website link to activate the cancellation. In order to activate your request and complete the process, you must follow the link e-mailed to you. Your cancellation will not be completed until you have confirmed the cancellation request by following the special link emailed to you. If you do not activate your request within the next 7 days, your cancellation will be discarded and your contract will remain active.
So since they know 90% of their customers are lazy (me) they know that they can wait a week before ACTUALLY canceling, then send you an email saying you haven’t actually cancelled yet, oh here click this link that we’re going to send you soon, oh and there’s a time limit on this deal. By the way, it’s been another week and I haven’t gotten that “second email,” probably a neat trick to get you to past that arbitrary deadline they set so you have to start the whole process over.
Pretty great customer support! If you liked this story and hate stunts like this, reblog so people can get the real story when they Google “cancel 1&1”.
-
zehnuhr reblogged jarredbishop:
Jarred Bishop created a Cargo Theme for tumblr. Really nicely done with jQuery navigation. Try it out or at least have a look around.











